To start off, net neutrality, is the principle that Internet service providers should treat all Internet communications equally and not discriminate or charge differently based on user, content, website, platform, application, type of equipment, or method of communication. Without net neutrality regulations, ISPs may prioritize certain types of traffic, meter others, or potentially block traffic from specific services, while charging consumers for various tiers of service.
In March 2015 ,the Federal Communications Commission issued its final net neutrality rules, reclassifying the Internet as a public utility. The agency’s historic step is aimed at preventing paid traffic prioritization, data blocking and bandwith throttling, which are among the biggest threats to a free and open Internet, net neutrality supporters say.
The internet provides a lot of service to people around the word and provides fast and easy to get information for us too. But, the downfall of the internet are the “trolls” that give out false information and the people who use the internet to promote hate and violence. Giving these people and others “open” free internet can be very dangerous to the communities. Simply put, a free and open Internet – which goes to the heart of the FCC’s intent – hinges on the ability of the IP networks to deliver and, even more importantly, perhaps, withstand the rising and relentless pressures of data.
According to research house IDC, the data universe is growing by 40% annually, which means it is doubling in size, effectively, every two years. At that rate, the data we create, copy and download annually will reach 44 zettabytes, or 44 trillion gigabytes, by 2020. 
Without net neutrality the internet can get messy fast. There are billions of people in this world who will and can make the internet chaotic. Net neutrality protects our internet as much as it can. Even with-it things get out of hands on many different aspects. Imagine the internet open and free? This can potentially even make people feel as if it is not safe for them more than they do now. The internet can go extinct before our eyes if the government decides to put it into the hands of IPS workers.
Online activism can be affective in many ways but also can not be affective. A huge factor that most look at before seeing if they want to partake to make a change is whats being protested or discussed. Being apart of an era that takes online activism not as serious as the earlier generations ; It is not affective. Theres a bunch of problems world wide that 9/10 gets brought to light over social media before any other platform. Taking that there are billions of people with online accounts that comment and see these (sometimes graphic) issues. People would say it’s easy to click on links about serious issues and keep scrolling, not really giving it the time of day to look over and spread it to others.:There are People that are just sharing or changing their profile pictures online to make themselves feel good, but sometimes these peopke are usually already activists in their own worlds. They are likely participants in the cause or organization and research shows that this sharing on social media doesn’t actually make a change. 
